Huginai vs TradingView: Which AI Trading Tool Is Right for You?

Where TradingView wins

TradingView has spent over a decade building the best charting platform in the world. If your trading is primarily technical analysis based — moving averages, RSI, support and resistance, custom Pine Script indicators — TradingView is unmatched.

• Chart quality: The cleanest, most customizable charting interface available, with 100+ built-in indicators and the ability to write your own in Pine Script.
• Community: Millions of published chart ideas from traders worldwide. Excellent for finding new setups and perspectives.
• Coverage: Stocks, forex, crypto, futures, and indices on a single platform.
• Price: A paid plan costs less than most data subscriptions. Current pricing is on tradingview.com.

The key limitation: TradingView’s intelligence is entirely price and volume based. It cannot tell you why a move is happening, only that price is doing something notable relative to historical patterns.

What Huginai actually is

A research stack, run by one operator, that reads public data and trades on paper. It is not sold, and it is not a substitute for TradingView. Here is what exists and what was measured.

• Collectors that run: Twitter/X, Telegram, RSS news, TradingView ideas, DexScreener, Etherscan and Hyperliquid readers, feeding a Postgres store. All public endpoints.
• The directional signal book is closed. Three cohorts, zero of them profitable. The final scenario returned −2.31% NAV. Measured win rate 40%, against the 57.4% needed to break even given the payoff shape. No positive slice at n≥5 on any axis — side, conviction bucket, source, ticker, or entry hour. The book is not being tuned or restarted.
• Conviction scoring was anti-predictive in all three cohorts. The 1–10 score that fronted the old product is excluded from gating and sizing.
• One thing survived measurement: a Hyperliquid funding-carry basket — short the perp against spot on coins where the funding floor holds. Over 60 days, net of taker fees and 5bps of assumed slippage per leg per side: HYPE 5.6% APR with 96.7% positive days, NEAR 5.2% with 100%, LDO 3.9% with 96.7% — and LDO at 3.9% sits below the 4.5% the desk requires before considering capital. It runs as a paper forward-test with a kill rule (auto-close when the trailing 7-day funding sum drops below 7 bps).
• Paper only, always. No real capital is deployed. There is no live executor, and none is being sold.

That is the whole inventory. Everything else — accounts, alerts for users, an API, a public trade log — does not exist today.

The carry figures close a 60-day window that ended 2026-07-08 and were re-costed on 2026-08-13, so they are already old. They read 6.4–7.7% before slippage entered the cost model; that earlier version was an upper bound.

The honest verdict

If you need a tool this week, use TradingView. Huginai has nothing to sell you and nothing to plug in. What it has is a written record of what was tested and what died:

• A multi-source directional signal engine, measured over three cohorts and shut down at a 40% win rate
• A Binance funding-arbitrage line, closed as structurally unworkable
• One carry construction still under paper forward-test, with its fees, kill rule and daily sign flips written down

Most tools in this category publish their wins. This one publishes the autopsy. Read it, take the method, and run your own numbers.

Questions